CRA Documentation
-
A Developer’s Guide to Spring Boot Actuator
Spring Boot Actuator is a sub-project of Spring Boot that adds production-ready features to your application. It provides built-in HTTP endpoints to monitor and manage your service, giving you immediate insights without writing complex custom code. What Is Spring Boot Actuator and Why You Need It Imagine deploying a new application into production. How do…
-
Open South Code: open south code essentials for EU compliance in 2026
If you’ve stumbled here looking for “open south code,” you’re in the right place, even if the term isn’t quite right. You’re most likely looking for information on open source code, a cornerstone of modern software development. But that typo also points to something real and increasingly important: the OpenSouthCode conference in Malaga, a major…
-
A Guide to AWS Secrets Manager for EU Compliance
Think of your application’s database credentials and API keys as the master keys to your business. Hardcoding them directly into your source code is the digital equivalent of leaving these keys under the doormat—a convenient but dangerously outdated practice. AWS Secrets Manager is the secure digital vault built to fix this, protecting credentials, managing their…
-
No Root Firewall Guide for IoT and Embedded Systems
A no root firewall acts as a dedicated security guard for individual applications, controlling their internet access without needing the ‘master keys’ to the entire system (root privileges). This is a major shift away from traditional firewalls that demand deep system integration, offering a far more contained and secure way to manage network traffic—especially for…
-
A Developer’s Guide to the GCC -o Option
The gcc -o option is a fundamental flag that tells the GCC compiler exactly what to name your output file. Instead of letting the compiler fall back to a generic, easily-overwritten file named a.out, this flag gives you complete control. It’s how you produce a clearly named executable or other build artefact. Why Is the…
-
Penetration Testing as a Service: Secure Your Product for CRA Compliance
For product manufacturers and IoT vendors, the ground has shifted. The old approach of a single, annual security check just doesn’t cut it anymore. Regulations like the EU’s Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) now demand continuous vigilance, forcing a move to more modern, agile security practices. This is where Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS) comes…
-
A Developer’s Guide to the GCC -f Option
The gcc -f option isn’t a single command. It’s a massive family of flags that give you direct, fine-grained control over how the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) generates code. These options are the tools of the trade for any serious developer wanting to go beyond the defaults. With -f flags, you can influence everything from…
-
Unlock Faster Builds with the gcc -pipe option
Ever heard of the gcc -pipe option? It’s a simple flag you can pass to your compiler, but it has a surprisingly big impact. In short, it tells GCC to use memory for all the intermediate steps of compilation instead of writing temporary files to your disk. This simple change means data gets passed directly…
-
A Guide to Black Duck Software for EU Compliance
At its core, Black Duck software is a powerful security tool that acts like a building inspector for your code. It automates the process of finding, inventorying, and analysing all the third-party and open-source components used in your applications—a process known in the industry as Software Composition Analysis (SCA). What Is Black Duck and How…
-
A Guide to the Qualys Cloud Agent for CRA Compliance
The Qualys Cloud Agent is a small, lightweight piece of software you install on your digital products to get continuous security and compliance monitoring. Think of it as a sensor that reports back on vulnerabilities, configurations, and inventory directly to the Qualys Cloud Platform. This gives you constant visibility into the security posture of your…
-
Your Practical OWASP Testing Guide for CRA Compliance in 2026
When you’re talking about web application security testing, the OWASP Testing Guide (OTG) is the framework that everyone builds on. It’s the industry-standard playbook, giving you a complete methodology and practical techniques to find and fix security vulnerabilities. What Is the OWASP Testing Guide The OWASP Testing Guide is essentially a detailed manual for testing…
-
Shift to Left Security for EU CRA Compliance
To put it simply, shift to left is all about moving security and testing to the very beginning of the product development lifecycle, instead of treating them as an afterthought. If you picture the development process as a timeline from left to right, this strategy pulls critical checks from the far right (just before launch)…
-
Artefact vs Artifact A Guide for Technical and Compliance Teams
When it comes to artefact vs artifact, the core of the issue isn’t about meaning—it’s about geography. The two words mean the exact same thing, but their spelling signals a regional preference. Think of it as the technical writing equivalent of “colour” versus “color.” The one you choose says a lot about your intended audience…
-
Master Terraform and Kubernetes with IaC for EKS, GKE, and AKS
When you bring Terraform and Kubernetes together, you create a single, declarative workflow for managing the entire lifecycle of your infrastructure and the applications running on it. This powerful pairing uses Infrastructure as Code (IaC) to automate everything from provisioning a cloud-managed cluster like EKS or GKE to deploying complex workloads, guaranteeing a setup that’s…
-
XDR vs EDR: Key Differences for Cyber Resilience (xdr vs edr)
When you get down to it, the difference between XDR and EDR is all about scope. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is like posting a dedicated security guard at each individual device—think of a connected thermostat or a smart factory sensor. It’s hyper-focused on that single asset. In contrast, Extended Detection and Response (XDR) acts…
-
Mastering maven dependency check: A Quick Guide to Secure Builds
A proactive maven dependency check is more than just good practice—it’s a foundational part of securing your software supply chain. At its core, it’s about systematically scanning your project’s third-party libraries for known vulnerabilities, stopping security flaws from ever making their way into your codebase. Why Dependency Management Is a Security Blind Spot Let’s be…
-
Mastering the Mvn Dependency Tree for Secure Software
When you’re working with Maven, the mvn dependency:tree command is your go-to for getting a complete, hierarchical picture of every library in your project. It doesn’t just show you the dependencies you’ve explicitly declared (direct ones), but also all the other libraries those dependencies pull in (transitive ones). Think of it as a detailed map…
-
Endpoint: endpoint protection services for IoT Cyber Resilience
Endpoint protection services are your dedicated security guard for every single device connected to a network—from a factory sensor to a smart thermostat. They provide the proactive defence and monitoring needed for individual entry points, which is absolutely vital as more and more products become internet-connected. For example, a modern car has over 100 electronic…
-
A Developer’s Guide to Docker RM Container
When you’re done with a Docker container, the docker rm command is your go-to tool for getting rid of it. You can target a container using its unique ID or its Name. Just be aware that Docker has a built-in safety net: it will throw an error if you try to remove a container that’s…
-
Maven vs Gradle Which Build Tool Is Right for Your Project?
The whole Maven vs Gradle debate really boils down to one thing: philosophy. Do you want a build tool that enforces a strict, conventional path using XML, or one that gives you a flexible, programmable toolkit with Groovy or Kotlin? Your answer depends entirely on whether your team values rigid standardisation for its predictability or…
CRA Documentation: how to build audit-ready evidence for the EU Cyber Resilience Act
CRA Documentation is the set of technical and organizational artifacts used to demonstrate that a product with digital elements meets the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) expectations. It covers how security is designed, implemented, tested, maintained, and improved throughout the product lifecycle, with a strong emphasis on traceability and repeatability.
This page collects practical guidance and related posts to help teams define a documentation baseline, keep evidence current across releases, and reduce compliance overhead by integrating documentation into existing engineering workflows.
Why CRA Documentation matters
Under CRA, being secure is not sufficient. Organizations should be able to show structured proof of how risks are assessed, how controls are applied, how vulnerabilities are handled, and how updates are delivered over time. Strong documentation reduces ambiguity, accelerates internal reviews, and improves readiness for customer and regulatory scrutiny.
Who owns CRA Documentation
CRA Documentation typically spans multiple teams. Product and engineering own architecture and delivery evidence, security owns control definition and risk governance, and support or operations own vulnerability intake and update processes. A single accountable owner is recommended to keep the evidence set consistent and versioned.
What CRA Documentation typically includes
In most organizations, documentation can be structured into a small number of evidence domains. The exact set depends on your product risk profile, but the goal is consistent: prove that security is systematic and maintained across the lifecycle.
Product security design and risk management
- Security requirements and assumptions
- Architecture overview with trust boundaries
- Threat models and mitigation decisions
- Risk assessments and risk acceptance records
Secure development lifecycle evidence
- Secure coding standards and review practices
- CI/CD security gates and release criteria
- Change management and traceability between requirements and releases
- Access control model for repositories and build systems
Security testing and validation
- SAST/DAST configurations and results summaries
- Dependency scanning and container scanning outputs
- Penetration test reports and remediation tracking
- Verification evidence for critical fixes
Vulnerability handling and post-market activities
- Vulnerability intake and triage workflow
- Internal remediation SLAs and escalation paths
- Coordinated disclosure process and communication templates
- Security update and patch policy, including supported versions
Supply chain and component visibility
- Component inventory and dependency governance
- SBOM where applicable and processes to keep it current
- Third-party risk assessment approach for critical suppliers
- Evidence of response capability for upstream vulnerabilities
How to operationalize CRA Documentation without creating bureaucracy
The most sustainable approach is to treat documentation as a product of normal delivery workflows, not as a separate compliance project. This means embedding documentation outputs into your engineering toolchain and defining lightweight ownership and review cadences.
Documentation principles that reduce long-term effort
- Version everything per release and link artifacts to a specific product version
- Prefer automation for evidence capture (CI logs, scan exports, release checks)
- Use a single evidence index that points to source-of-truth documents
- Define a minimum baseline and expand only where risk justifies it
Recommended structure for a CRA Documentation “evidence pack”
- Overview and scope statement for the product/version
- Architecture and threat model package
- Security testing bundle with summaries and raw outputs
- Vulnerability management policy and operating runbooks
- Support and security update policy (including end-of-life rules)
- Supply chain evidence (inventory, SBOM where applicable, third-party notes)
Metrics to keep CRA Documentation credible
- Remediation time by severity
- Testing coverage across repositories and release pipelines
- Update cadence and supported-version adherence
- Recurring vulnerability classes and preventive actions
Related posts and resources on CRA Documentation
This section is designed to host posts that help teams build, maintain, and audit CRA Documentation efficiently.
Documentation baselines
CRA Documentation checklist: minimum evidence for audit readiness
A baseline list of artifacts most teams need, with a focus on traceability, versioning, and low-effort maintenance.
Evidence automation
Automating CRA Documentation from CI/CD and security tooling
How to capture test results, scans, and release gates automatically and centralize evidence without duplicating work.
Vulnerability and updates
CRA Documentation for vulnerability handling: proving your process works
What to document about intake, triage, remediation, validation, and communication, and how to keep it current as issues evolve.
Supply chain
SBOM governance as CRA Documentation: keeping component evidence current
How to manage SBOM and dependency evidence in a way that stays accurate across frequent releases.
Audit readiness
Building a CRA evidence pack that auditors can navigate
How to structure an evidence index, reduce ambiguity, and make it easy to confirm compliance per product version.
Download free CRA Checklist 2025
The definitive CRA checklist for assessing your organization’s readiness for the Cyber Resilience Act.
By submitting this form, you accept our Terms and acknowledge that Regulus will process your data to send the checklist. For more details, see our Privacy Policy.