CRA Requirements

CRA Requirements: what the EU Cyber Resilience Act demands and how to operationalize it

CRA Requirements are the obligations set by the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) for products with digital elements placed on the EU market. They focus on reducing cybersecurity risk through security by design and by default, consistent vulnerability management, and clear accountability across the product lifecycle.

This page consolidates practical resources and related posts to help teams interpret CRA, implement them in engineering and operations, and maintain audit-ready evidence over time.

What counts as CRA in practice

CRA Requirements typically span product security engineering, supply chain controls, documentation, and post-market processes. The goal is to make cybersecurity measurable and maintainable rather than ad hoc.

Who needs to care about CRA

CRA Requirements can affect manufacturers, software publishers, importers, distributors, and other parties involved in delivering products with digital elements. If you build or ship software, connected devices, or components that end up in the EU market, you should assume CRA Requirements are relevant to your product governance and delivery model.

Core CRA Requirements for products with digital elements

Although the details depend on product category and risk profile, most implementations of CRA Requirements can be organized into a few operational domains.

Security by design

Security by design requires embedding cybersecurity controls into architecture and development practices from the earliest stages, minimizing attack surface and preventing common classes of vulnerabilities.

Security by default

Security by default means shipping products with secure configurations out of the box. Default credentials, unnecessary services, and permissive settings should be avoided unless there is a justified and controlled need.

Vulnerability handling and coordinated disclosure

CRA Requirements push organizations to implement a repeatable vulnerability lifecycle: intake, triage, prioritization, remediation, validation, and communication. Clear channels and responsibilities are essential.

Secure development lifecycle controls

  • Threat modeling and security requirements definition
  • Secure coding standards and peer review practices
  • Automated security testing integrated into CI/CD
  • Release gating based on severity and risk acceptance

Supply chain and dependency risk management

CRA Requirements extend to the software and component supply chain. Organizations should track critical dependencies, assess risk, and maintain the ability to rapidly respond to vulnerabilities in third-party components.

Technical documentation and compliance evidence

CRA Requirements are enforceable only if organizations can demonstrate that controls are implemented and maintained. Documentation should be consistent, traceable, and versioned.

Common evidence artifacts aligned to CRA Requirements

  • Product security architecture notes and threat models
  • Risk assessments and mitigation plans
  • Security testing results and remediation records
  • Component inventory and SBOM where applicable
  • Vulnerability management policy and operating procedures
  • Support, update, and end-of-life policy

How to implement CRA step by step

A strong implementation turns CRA Requirements into concrete controls, measurable outcomes, and sustained operational routines.

Step 1: define scope, product boundaries, and ownership

  • Identify products and versions in scope
  • Map responsibilities across product, engineering, security, legal, and support
  • Define an internal compliance owner and escalation paths

Step 2: map CRA Requirements to your SDLC and operations

  • Translate requirements into security controls, policies, and runbooks
  • Embed controls into development workflows and release processes
  • Operationalize monitoring, vulnerability intake, and patch delivery

Step 3: establish metrics and continuous improvement

  • Remediation time by severity and component criticality
  • Testing coverage across code, dependencies, and releases
  • Update adoption and support window adherence
  • Defect trends and recurring vulnerability classes

Related posts about CRA

This section is intended to host posts that unpack CRA Requirements by theme and provide implementation guidance.

Interpretation and scope

CRA explained: scope, roles, and obligations

A practical breakdown of what CRA Requirements mean for product teams and how to translate them into responsibilities and delivery milestones.

Engineering and security controls

Security by design vs security by default under CRA

How to implement secure architectures and ship hardened defaults while keeping usability and operational constraints in mind.

Vulnerability and disclosure

Vulnerability handling aligned to CRA

How to design an intake-to-fix workflow, set internal SLAs, validate patches, and communicate updates effectively.

Supply chain

SBOM and dependency governance for CRA

How to build practical dependency visibility and response capability without creating operational overhead.

Audit readiness

Evidence pack for CRA: what to collect and how to maintain it

Which artifacts matter most, how to version them, and how to keep evidence current as products evolve.

Download free CRA Checklist 2025

The definitive CRA checklist for assessing your organization’s readiness for the Cyber Resilience Act.

    Regulus Logo
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.